Do You Need a Shoring Engineer, Structural Engineer, or Geotechnical Engineer?
See how ground investigation, building design, and excavation support fit together, and where a shoring or specialty foundation engineer can join your project team.
Resource hub
Guides for excavation depth, support footprint, anchor rights, access, and construction sequence.
Shoring has to fit the excavation depth, nearby structures, property limits, access, and the work that follows it. These guides explain the decisions that shape a temporary support system while the project team is still comparing concepts or preparing for bidding.
Use the articles to organize drawings, geotechnical information, property constraints, and sequence assumptions before requesting a proposal. Related services and project records provide the next level of detail.
Planning guides
See how ground investigation, building design, and excavation support fit together, and where a shoring or specialty foundation engineer can join your project team.
A finished retaining wall and the shoring needed to build it serve different purposes. Learn how the two designs affect excavation, bracing, access, and construction.
When property rights or underground structures restrict tiebacks, rakers and internal bracing may provide support. See how the alternatives affect construction space.
How nearby Metro tunnels, tieback limits, demolition, and construction access affect shoring for a Los Angeles basement, with the Wilshire Grand example.
How an active hospital campus affects excavation support: existing utilities, neighboring buildings, service access, and construction of the new basement.
What San Diego hazard maps establish, and why basement depth, sloping grades, ground investigation, and nearby foundations still need site-specific review.
How shoring, sewer connections, sidewalk use, and construction access compete for space at the frontage of a San Francisco basement project.
How changes in basement depth, ramps, and foundations affect San Jose excavation support, alongside site investigation and the City geologic review.
How temporary water control relates to Sacramento excavation support, groundwater information, discharge permissions, and the permanent basement.
A Dallas retaining wall needs room for its foundation, drainage, and construction excavation. Learn how streets and easements affect that work.
How tiebacks, internal bracing, ramps, and temporary foundations change the space needed to construct a Fort Worth basement.
How underground support, utilities, and temporary street use affect Austin excavation shoring, including the difference between agreements and permits.
Adding a basement or pit to an existing San Antonio building? See how foundations, retained structures, and equipment access shape the shoring design.
Groundwater affects shoring, water control, and basement construction. Understand how those designs connect on a Houston excavation.
A liquefaction finding can affect a Salt Lake City basement project. Understand what the geotechnical study, foundation design, and shoring each address.
Nearby footings, limited anchor space, and narrow access can shape an Ogden infill basement. See where shoring and underpinning design meet.
Expansive soils swell and shrink; collapsible soils can settle when wetted. See why the distinction matters for St. George foundations and excavation.
A Park City building can fit its site while excavation equipment and shoring need more room. See how access, braces, soil handling, and site limits connect.
A utility pit needs room for support and installation as well as the finished chamber. See how nearby utilities and foundations shape an Orem excavation.
See how ramps, a pedestrian bridge, drilling access, and temporary platforms shaped Cefali’s shoring at 755 Fig and Wilshire Grand Center.
How Cefali supported retained basement walls at Westfield Century City while old floors were removed and new decks and foundations were built.
Thompson Hotel’s three basement levels required excavation up to 46 feet. See how parking clearances, rakers, and floor changes shaped Cefali’s design.
How Cefali supported excavation around retained stairs, seating, tunnels, and historic buildings at USC Coliseum and Columbia Square in Hollywood.
Cefali’s work at LAX and Hollywood Burbank Airport shows how utilities, large foundations, existing structures, and construction access shape shoring.
At Vista Monterey in Corona, property limits led Cefali to combine soil nail and soldier pile walls. See how reinforcement space affects wall design.
When tiebacks cannot extend beyond a Los Angeles site, rakers and cross-lot braces may need space inside it. See Cefali examples at Intuit Dome and G-8.
See how nearby foundations and basements affected Cefali’s shoring at 755 Fig, G-8, and USC Coliseum, and when separate underpinning may be needed.
What changes a Los Angeles shoring bid: basement depth, foundation geometry, tieback rights, Metro constraints, equipment loads, and construction stages.
How depth, neighboring basements, property rights, and access shape soldier pile shoring, with Cefali examples at 1201 S. Hope, G-8, and Intuit Dome.
Deep utilities and underground structures can change tieback angles, pile locations, and bracing. See Cefali examples from Hollywood, Downtown LA, and Burbank.
At 6th & Bixel and Thompson Hotel, Cefali modified shoring for deeper excavation while retaining soldier piles. See what the engineering review involved.
Look for shoring experience with the conditions on your site: deep basements, nearby buildings, restricted tiebacks, construction access, and field changes.
What Los Angeles BOE reviews for shoring beside the public way, including foundation plans, tieback depth, utilities, and dewatering information.
How groundwater assumptions, wells, tanks, discharge routes, and settlement monitoring affect the space and design needed for Los Angeles excavation shoring.
See how monitoring accompanied Cefali’s excavation support at Wilshire Grand, Century Plaza, and TEN50, from pile installation through deep excavation.
Understand the parts of a shoring system, where they fit around an excavation, and how Cefali used them on Los Angeles projects.
See how excavation depth, tieback rights, access, utilities, and field changes affect shoring design and construction, with examples from Cefali projects.
Related services
Documented project examples
Review the site conditions and engineering work documented in these project records.
Wilshire Grand Center required excavation support to be coordinated with phased demolition of an existing basement, a tower mat foundation extending 98 feet below Wilshire Boulevard, and nearby Metro tunnels.
900 Wilshire Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90017
Cefali and Malcolm Drilling coordinated shoring around a court more than 30 feet below grade, construction access, large crane loads, and locations where tieback agreements were unavailable.
3930 W. Century Blvd., Inglewood, CA 90303
Excavation depths ranged from 25 to 97 feet, with heavy adjacent-building surcharges, internal bracing, underpinning, and temporary pedestrian-access support.
755 S. Figueroa St. (now Beaudry at 960 W. 7th St.), Los Angeles, CA
Discuss your project
Share the plans, geotechnical information, site photos, and known constraints so the engineering scope can be discussed around the actual site.